News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by superflyguy on Thursday June 07, 2018 @02:36PM (#17258787)
Interesting, and also...a lie? Or he thinks the 250,000 projects migrated to gitlab within 24 hours of the news that Microsoft was going anywhere near GitHub is a small number.
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by bovermyer on Thursday June 07, 2018 @02:48PM (#17258914)
That IS a small number. Consider the context.
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by sdesol on Thursday June 07, 2018 @03:03PM (#17259068)
Yeah I really think people are trying to read way too much into things. The only true bellwether in my opinion, are influential open source projects leaving GitHub for something else, like self hosting with GitLab/Bitbucket/etc.

If nodejs, google, and other big names/organizations decides to leave, then I think it is time for Microsoft to worry.

Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by superflyguy on Friday June 08, 2018 @03:45AM (#17263433)
Gnome, Debian and gimp have all left.
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by sdesol on Friday June 08, 2018 @11:40AM (#17266515)
Were they ever hosted on GitHub?
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by mythrwy on Thursday June 07, 2018 @03:06PM (#17259100)
Not for 24 hours it isn't.
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by penagwin on Thursday June 07, 2018 @03:12PM (#17259149)
Right, but I doubt it'll continue at such a rate. This kind of stuff happens a lot (netflix making it harder to use VPNs, the recent facebook stuff, etc), "mass of people leave" but in reality it's a very small group, who are rather loud. Plus, mirroring isn't the same as leaving (IMO). To me it's more of a precaution.
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by superflyguy on Thursday June 07, 2018 @07:14PM (#17261212)
Right, I mean it can't continue at that rate forever - the numbers don't support that hypothesis.
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by crtasm on Thursday June 07, 2018 @03:11PM (#17259148)
I wonder how many people/organisations own those 250k projects, I assume it is far less than 250k.
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by skinnymuch on Thursday June 07, 2018 @07:56PM (#17261425)
Yeah. For example, I just put up and am putting up a few more repos of old code I had lying around. With those I have over 15 repos on GitHub. Unfortunately, but also not uncommon at all, the most stars any repo has is 5 with most having none. So, no repos that are material to GitHub.
Re:I’m Nat Friedman, Future CEO of GitHub. AMA by skinnymuch on Thursday June 07, 2018 @07:53PM (#17261404)
Is the number 250k projects (are projects repos?) in first 24 hours? I thought it was topping 100K repos imported to Gitlab at some point on Tuesday. This is from Gitlab giving those numbers themselves in a post that was linked from here.

The first hint of Microsoft and GitHub was around 6 pm EDT/11 pm UTC on Sunday.

And like others are saying. Even if that is the case, it isn’t a huge number with context of Github’s size.