Re:How The New York Times Uses Software to Recognize Members...
by raleec on Thursday June 07, 2018 @02:42PM
(#17258853)
citation please.
(It is in 21 states in 2017)
Re:How The New York Times Uses Software to Recognize Members...
by smacktoward on Thursday June 07, 2018 @02:46PM
(#17258889)
Today I learned!
Re:How The New York Times Uses Software to Recognize Members...
by X6S1x6Okd1st on Thursday June 07, 2018 @06:39PM
(#17260982)
> Note: Minnesota's statute applies to both partners if they are both married. If one partner is unmarried the law only applies to the married woman. The law does not apply to a married man and unmarried woman.
That's pretty terrible.
Also the legend is pretty amusing:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/U.S._Adu...
Re:How The New York Times Uses Software to Recognize Members...
by panarky on Thursday June 07, 2018 @02:27PM
(#17258698)
Lying about it is an impeachable offense.
Re:How The New York Times Uses Software to Recognize Members...
by X6S1x6Okd1st on Thursday June 07, 2018 @02:36PM
(#17258795)
Lying is not an impeachable offense, however perjury certainly is.
Re:How The New York Times Uses Software to Recognize Members...
by foota on Thursday June 07, 2018 @02:34PM
(#17258774)
*to a court only though, no?
Re:How The New York Times Uses Software to Recognize Members...
by smt88 on Thursday June 07, 2018 @02:29PM
(#17258712)
Only under oath
Adultery is not a crime.
(You can argue that it's an indicator of a person's character, or lack thereof, sure. But that's something different.)