Re:The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
by imglorp on Thursday June 07, 2018 @09:42AM
(#17255658)
In some cultures, you're smart to get ahead any way you can, and they'd call anyone a fool who followed some set of rules or principles instead of getting ahead. For them, rules are artificial, arbitrary social constructs with zero benefit, while results are concrete. It's hard to argue they're wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That depends on expectations, whether in a given industry or culture. In most professional settings showing your hand as essentially a mercenary in terms of allegiance and showing no stickiness, will result in considering an alternative candidate, in the US.
Yes I think there is some deceit required for those implementing this philosphophy but it doesn't change the strategy.
We, also got burned by someone who accepted another offer and quit, a week after beginning work with us. Obviously, that guy--and whoever recommended him--are on our shitlist now. Word does get around hopefully.
A business not wanting to invest time hiring, training and integrating an employee who is likely to leave prematurely is not an abstract principle.
Then the business must be willing to pay generously.
Re:The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
by loco5niner on Thursday June 07, 2018 @01:44PM
(#17258239)
> and they'd call anyone a fool who followed some set of rules or principles instead of getting ahead
> It's hard to argue they're wrong.
Except for the fact that in this very thread there seems to be quite a backlash against them. Seems to be very short-term and selfish thinking.
Re:The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
by thedevilslawyer on Friday June 08, 2018 @03:05AM
(#17263247)
If the cost of multi-multi-billion dollar industry is backlash on the internet forums, that's hardly a difficult choice.
Re:The end of India’s ‘IT miracle’?
by loco5niner on Friday June 08, 2018 @12:04PM
(#17266761)
Except when that "backlash on the internet forums" is a reflection of what is happening in reality which seems to be the case here.
>It's hard to argue they're wrong.
Eugenics. Thalidomide. Radium paint. Lead paint. Leaded gasoline. The list goes on.
It's quite easy to argue against taking shortcuts and eschewing rigor in favor of "results" if you know some history and have some perspective.
Actually it is quite easy, cost of doing business in such cultures is much higher as you can not really trust anything and must guard against a knife in the back at any moment.
There is a huge amount of friction that eliminates if counterparty can be trusted vast majority of the time.