Re:We Shouldn’t Be Surprised at the Theranos Fraud
by laughinghan on Thursday June 07, 2018 @06:45PM
(#17261019)
But journalists aren't murdered in those other countries for inaccuracy, at least not as far as I understand, and not in any of the examples brought up by GP. They're murdered for reporting awful truths more accurately than someone powerful and evil wanted.
I don't see how that obviates the need for journalists to be properly incentivized to report accurately and with healthy skepticism.
Re:We Shouldn’t Be Surprised at the Theranos Fraud
by nojvek on Thursday June 07, 2018 @10:31AM
(#17256042)
Can anyone give me a list of respectable independent media that I should be subscribing to?
The economist comes to mind. Any others HN recommends?
Re:We Shouldn’t Be Surprised at the Theranos Fraud
by oliveshell on Thursday June 07, 2018 @12:29PM
(#17257371)
For general news, I find NPR.org [1] to be pretty good. I can tell they make an effort to avoid bias and sensationalism. It’s not perfect, but I have yet to find another online source that I prefer.
I also listen to my local station (WUNC) and if you’re in a decently populated area of the U.S., your local NPR affiliate is also likely high quality (plus it’s easy to listen online if you’re not into terrestrial radio.)
[1]: https://npr.org
Yes Journalists need high standards of professional integrity and the legal air cover to maintain that.
But really the ultimate defence is us - to reject the mountains of crap out there and seek out and subscribe to the worthwhile news sources.
As ever, it's down to us.