Re:GitHub Is Microsoft’s $7.5B Undo Button
by megaman22 on Thursday June 07, 2018 @02:02AM
(#17253654)
Oculus is vaporware, right? I don't see anything that encourages me that whatever thing they were aiming at will be a thing?
Re:GitHub Is Microsoft’s $7.5B Undo Button
by joefourier on Thursday June 07, 2018 @05:41AM
(#17254498)
Vaporware is software/hardware that is never actually manufactured or released to the public. Oculus has released the Rift, the Go and (with Samsung) the Gear VR, which are all available in stores now. All are successful, if relatively niche, products performing as intended, which is the opposite of vaporware.
It's not vaporware. It's available for purchase, and it fulfills its advertised purpose as a video game peripheral. The ecosystem of available games could be better, but it's far from stillborn.
> First, politics is about getting and keeping political power. It is not about the general welfare of "We, the people."
Or I guess here, 'we the developers.'
I don't think Microsoft is at all alone in this spot. Github got a huge payout from this. It benefited them. We don't think of them as a Microsoft style company, but they made the same decision we might have seen in reverse. They didn't sell out before, but now the payout was significantly high enough. It's the old "You'd be stupid to turn down that much money" line from Thank You for Smoking.
But keep in mind, Adobe, Oracle, Intel, Amazon .. they'd probably all do something like this if some essential backers on the board thought it was in their best interest, with the goals always being around maximizing profit (so you can pay all those CFOs, CTOs, board members and controlling stock members). The people who make these decisions care about staying in power .. and are most likely very far removed from actual development .. or their userbase (in this case the same thing).
Just look at what happened with a userbase of gamers and the Facebook purchase of Oculus.