News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Retguard: An improved stack protector for OpenBSD by toast0 on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @12:19PM (#17248386)
> CVS is not maintained for more then a decade

Have you considered CVS may have been finished for over a decade? OpenBSD has been using it for a long time, and it clearly meets their needs, or they'd chose from one of the many other choices.

In my own experience, it's nice to use finished software, step off of the upgrade treadmill, and get to the end of the learning curve.

Re:Retguard: An improved stack protector for OpenBSD by atonse on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @12:56PM (#17248803)
Are you suggesting that there is nothing about CVS that frustrates its users? Surely there is always room for improvement, even if for performance reasons.

Feature bloat, totally agree. But even for bug fixes and performance improvements, I have a hard time believing this is truly finished.

Re:Retguard: An improved stack protector for OpenBSD by toast0 on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @02:33PM (#17249763)
I suspect that any remaining user frustrations are either issues with fundamentals of the design, impossible to fix without frustrating other users, or don't rise up to the level of a bug report, let alone a patch.

Based on the timeline of CVS, I doubt there are that many large performance issues that can be fixed without significant risk of breaking. In my experience, CVS was primarily limited by network and disk I/O, both if which ate generally much improved since the time of active CVS development.

Keep in mind that the effective scope of CVS is also shrinking as many users move on to other software; that means any issues are less likely to surface.