Maybe it should be more explicit:
> No person shall, without the authority of the copyright owner or the law intentionally remove or alter any copyright management information.
> No person shall, without the authority of the copyright owner
If the copyright holder is explicitly telling the user to remove all trace of them, that seems like they are granting the authority to do so, no?
Basically yes. Thinking as a lawyer though you don't want to leave interpretation of "trace or track" to a judge. In the rare case that there is a dispute, it opens it up for ambiguities which increase risk.
I mean sure. If you want to do it by the books, but the whole thing is a joke.
Right. I hope nobody actually uses this joke because to a lawyer it is not so.
By changing the license file.