News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:If wages are to rise, workers need more bargaining power by IkmoIkmo on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @08:50AM (#17246638)
Well of course such a number can. You just calculate average price increases, weighed by their share of spending (a 1% increase in healthcare has more implications than a 1% increase in telephone bills) to the best of your ability.

The question is, how good is the approximation and how meaningful is an average statistic?

The statistic is useful and meaningful, but doesn't say everything. Fortunately we have hundreds of inflation metrics, for different groups (urban, rural), age groups, countries, states, regions and sectors.

Virtually none of these are published in media outside the general CPI measure, but all can be found on government/centralbank/consultants etc websites, typically with methodological sections explaining how they came to their conclusions.

For example: https://www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm

Here you can find various inflation figures, methodology and data.

Re:If wages are to rise, workers need more bargaining power by vanderZwan on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @10:02AM (#17247195)
Not to get sidetracked into a semantic argument, but as a non-native speaker of English: isn't that exactly what "capture" in "capture difficult issues" is supposed to mean?
Re:If wages are to rise, workers need more bargaining power by IkmoIkmo on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @10:56AM (#17247639)
You're right, I think I was misreading you.

Indeed (as you edited), the national inflation figure can 'capture' it in the statistic sense, but cannot capture it in the sense that the number expresses individual paint points that different subsections of the population experiences, like rent in a HCOL urban area, or the inability for wages to catch up with an ever increasing downpayment requirement.

Re:If wages are to rise, workers need more bargaining power by vanderZwan on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @12:08PM (#17248273)
Thank you for clarifying!