News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Behind the Messy, Expensive Split Between Facebook and Wh... by neogodless on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @01:40PM (#17240117)
Just because someone is convinced to part with their money does not mean they meaningfully added value to their life.

Certainly generates value for Facebook and retail, though.

Re:Behind the Messy, Expensive Split Between Facebook and Wh... by redditmigrant on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @02:25PM (#17240586)
If they themselves say they discovered a product that they were interested in, how is that not value addition? Value isnt defined in your advertising free ivory tower.
Re:Behind the Messy, Expensive Split Between Facebook and Wh... by kelnos on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @12:20AM (#17244331)
It isn't defined in your ad-filled cesspool, either. I don't see convincing someone to buy something as an absolute positive value. There's nuance. Making someone aware of a product that will genuinely improve their life is great, but most ads in my experience are more like drug pushers.
Re:Behind the Messy, Expensive Split Between Facebook and Wh... by cm2012 on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @02:00PM (#17240321)
Ah, yes, because we brilliant hacker news readers know that the average person is too stupid to know what things they should buy or not buy.
Re:Behind the Messy, Expensive Split Between Facebook and Wh... by mfringel on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @02:20PM (#17240535)
That's not my interpretation of that comment. To wit:

There are only a few things you can know about someone clicking 'buy' as the result of an ad:

1. The ad platform booked top-line revenue

2. The seller booked top-line revenue

3. The buyer exchanged money for something they thought was worth it at the time of purchase.

That's it. Even #3 is conjecture, but it's likely enough that I'm willing to run with it for sake of argument.

We do not, and short of asking, can not know if that purchase added value to the buyer's life.