Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a court order

Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by gm-conspiracy on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @11:56AM (#17238883)

So, if you have a DSLR camera on a tripod set to a timer, and you do not actually take the picture, you have no claim to copyright of that image, even though the device you owned created it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by FireBeyond on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @01:10PM (#17239754)

Wasn't this a copyright claim against Wikipedia, where an ape picked up a camera and took a selfie, and Wikipedia et al decided that meant the camera owner had no copyright claim over the image?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by gm-conspiracy on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @01:18PM (#17239839)

yes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by Analemma_ on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @12:06PM (#17239012)

The court system is not, in fact, a dumb automaton that is bamboozled by questions like this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by delbel on Tuesday June 05, 2018 @12:10PM (#17239064)

... Yet. I read this in a cynical 90's AT&T commercial "You Will..."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla won’t give drivers their own crash data without a c... by Dylan16807 on Wednesday June 06, 2018 @11:42AM (#17248033)

Timed photo definitely has copyright. Continuous surveillance footage is an open question.

But the post you're replying to wasn't about copyright at all.

[ Parent | on HN ]