News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:F*EX – Frams' Fast File EXchange by bo1024 on Friday June 01, 2018 @06:56PM (#17211205)
Interesting. My questions (1) what is the timestamp of this page (created or last modified)? (2) Could you use a torrent client to solve this problem?
Re:F*EX – Frams' Fast File EXchange by derefr on Friday June 01, 2018 @07:19PM (#17211365)
1. From http://fex.belwue.de/fex.html, it looks like the software can't be any older than 2006. Looking at the source, it uses things like rel="prefetch". The style is just an explicit aesthetic, then, like that of Craigslist.

2. Some of it could, yeah. Torrents make it easy to share files directly from your computer to a peer's. FEX solves a slightly different problem, though—the asynchronous "put the file somewhere, then let the peer get it while your computer is offline" use-case. It's somewhat cumbersome to use torrents for this (though possible: you and the server join the swarm, the server leeches from you, you leave the swarm, the peer joins the swarm, they leech from the server.) But, if you do use torrents that way, you won't [by default] get the "auto-deletion of the server's copy" property that FEX has.

(You could probably match 99% of FEX's functionality with a torrent client running on a server + a daemon running alongside it that can control the torrent client through RPC; but I don't know of any attempt to build such a thing.)

Re:F*EX – Frams' Fast File EXchange by tapia on Saturday June 02, 2018 @09:12AM (#17214437)
I use this software at work and can say that it is in active development (last version: 20180528 (Arch Linux)... that means just a couple of days ago). But my favorite part of F*EX is the sharing of versioned file archives (https://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/sharing/ ).
Re:F*EX – Frams' Fast File EXchange by khc on Friday June 01, 2018 @07:57PM (#17211607)
looks like the software itself is from 2006 - 2016: http://fex.belwue.de/fex.html
Re:F*EX – Frams' Fast File EXchange by kiith_naabal on Friday June 01, 2018 @09:07PM (#17211960)
It references an xkcd from September 2011, which gives you a lower bound for last modified at least.