News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon follows Google and Apple and bans system-wide ad b... by PaulHoule on Thursday May 31, 2018 @12:56PM (#17197914)
Hypothetically it pays for the content. I think practically most content gets ripped off and copied and has ads slapped on it. If you are using a programming language (say Python) that has useful documentation (Clojure is a counterexample; just buy Rick's book.) you are almost always better off looking up things in the manual because Google surfaces advertising sites that add nothing but mistakes, omissions, broken English, etc. I think of how 80% of the Python answers on stack overflow have something like "print x" and won't work on Py 3.

It is hard to find content which is really worthwhile on the advertising supported web. The very nature of it is that valuable content is devalued relative to spam. Like Gresham's law, bad content drives out good.

Re:Amazon follows Google and Apple and bans system-wide ad b... by s73v3r_ on Thursday May 31, 2018 @01:26PM (#17198240)
That's never happened to me, at least with Python. Usually one of the first links is right to Python's own documentation.
Re:Amazon follows Google and Apple and bans system-wide ad b... by HillaryBriss on Thursday May 31, 2018 @02:10PM (#17198617)
i dunno. i've had reasonably good luck on StackOverflow for android related questions. given Google's sometimes inconsistent/irregular APIs and documentation, and a certain amount of bugginess, Android devs would have a lot harder time without SO.

but, your comment highlights a kind of surprising reality about ad dollars and Google. i mean, StackOverflow captures a significant quantity of ad money from Android related content because, in the early days of Android development, Google itself directed Android developers to StackOverflow.