News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why “children,” not “childs”? (2016) by posterboy on Sunday May 27, 2018 @05:48PM (#17169275)
what do you suggest instead: naif, nife, nyve ..?
Re:Why “children,” not “childs”? (2016) by Zarath on Sunday May 27, 2018 @06:23PM (#17169422)
nife is fine
Re:Why “children,” not “childs”? (2016) by gizmo686 on Sunday May 27, 2018 @08:06PM (#17169875)
Why is there an "e" at the end?
Re:Why “children,” not “childs”? (2016) by asveikau on Sunday May 27, 2018 @08:31PM (#17169954)
I'm reminded of how English orthography has that weird thing where the presence of a silent E can seemingly change the vowel in the previous syllable. For example the Tom Lehrer song, "who can turn a can into a cane? Silent E..."

So a hypothetical "nife" would never be mistaken for "neef", as "nif" could be.

Re:Why “children,” not “childs”? (2016) by Izkata on Sunday May 27, 2018 @09:02PM (#17170051)
Or mistaken for niff. [0]

(No, I didn't know this word existed before this moment.)

[0] https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/niff

Re:Why “children,” not “childs”? (2016) by whatsstolat on Sunday May 27, 2018 @06:05PM (#17169344)
Move to a phonetic alphabet. E.g. Arabic.
Re:Why “children,” not “childs”? (2016) by posterboy on Sunday May 27, 2018 @07:06PM (#17169620)
We could also just add accents, diacrits to exhaustion to englissh letters. Without that in arabic you couldn't even tell /a/, /e/, /i/ apart, they are all aleph in word initial position. Our orthographie is phine, your pronnuntzashun is just lazy
Re:Why “children,” not “childs”? (2016) by kimmk on Monday May 28, 2018 @05:02AM (#17171392)
You can write phonetically on the Latin alphabet perfectly fine, for example Finnish does so. In the case of English, its a matter of standardizing the pronunciation of characters (considering it requires every English speaker to essentially learn to write/read again, just changing the alphabet to Arabic is almost easier).