Re:Manos de Mono: The Manifesto (.NET Web Framework)
by WorkerBee on Wednesday September 22, 2010 @01:04PM
(#1716779)
You'd have to know all the other frameworks in order to know that yours is simpler.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Manos de Mono: The Manifesto (.NET Web Framework)
by jordan0day on Wednesday September 22, 2010 @01:11PM
(#1716794)
No. You would have to know all the other frameworks in order to know that yours is simplest. You only need a few points of reference to be able to say it is simpler.
FTA: "To me, writing apps with Django or Tornado has always been much more enjoyable. MonoRail and MVC were big improvements over webforms, but still they felt difficult to me, especially if you aren’t using an IDE."
Re:Manos de Mono: The Manifesto (.NET Web Framework)
by markkanof on Wednesday September 22, 2010 @01:20PM
(#1716826)
I do wonder how much of that simplicity is because of dynamic languages and not directly because of the framework. I've done quite a few projects with ASP.NET MVC and in my opinion it makes most things pretty easy. But there seem to be some things in Rails that make life easier, but they are really features from Ruby that you can use in Rails.
Re:Manos de Mono: The Manifesto (.NET Web Framework)
by bad_user on Wednesday September 22, 2010 @01:43PM
(#1716898)
http://www.playframework.org/ is more likable than ASP.NET MVC, while Java is more rigid / verbose than C#.
Start from there.
Re:Manos de Mono: The Manifesto (.NET Web Framework)
by SI1233 on Thursday September 23, 2010 @03:00AM
(#1718831)
+1 for play. much better, simple and complete than asp.net mvc
Re:Manos de Mono: The Manifesto (.NET Web Framework)
by eduardoflores on Wednesday September 22, 2010 @01:17PM
(#1716818)
Well, it's not my framework, I just posted the link. So, I'll not judge if it's simpler or not. All I say is that it looks promising.