Re:GDPR for lazy people: Block all European users with Cloud...
by jacquesm on Friday May 25, 2018 @03:42PM
(#17157194)
It's not possible for a financial institution to exist without incurring 'extra costs' for SOX and KYC compliance. And yet they all do. That pesky regulation seems to be useful.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GDPR for lazy people: Block all European users with Cloud...
by Sargos on Friday May 25, 2018 @07:10PM
(#17158901)
Actually this has been a big problem in the cryptocurrency space. It's entirely too onerous to comply with the rather extreme regulations in the finance space so exchanges had to ignore them for the longest time. Some exchanges even have to move countries because it would be nearly impossible to operate "legally". Yet their services are still needed and if they didn't have this freedom and flexibility then the cryptocurrency space might not have had the tools it needed to grow and innovate.
Re:GDPR for lazy people: Block all European users with Cloud...
by mirko22 on Friday May 25, 2018 @04:30PM
(#17157653)
But isn’t SOX for publicy traded companies only?
Re:GDPR for lazy people: Block all European users with Cloud...
by jacquesm on Friday May 25, 2018 @04:34PM
(#17157695)
Yes, but some of it applies to privately held companies as well.
Most large banks and insurance companies are listed.
Re:GDPR for lazy people: Block all European users with Cloud...
by bsder on Friday May 25, 2018 @07:50PM
(#17159151)
Oddly, Sarbanes-Oxley also had implications if you were a 501(c)(3) non-profit.
We had two major expenses: liability insurance for meetings and SOX insurance for the officers. Everything else was in the noise.