Re:Three Charged in Fatal Kansas ‘Swatting’ Attack
by mahart on Thursday May 24, 2018 @05:07PM
(#17148417)
He instructed other people to delete tweets/messages after learning someone died to cover up what happened. That seems like obstruction and conspiracy to me.
I think it is a stretch to call tweeting a wrong address "wire fraud" though.
Re:Three Charged in Fatal Kansas ‘Swatting’ Attack
by loeg on Thursday May 24, 2018 @06:46PM
(#17149183)
I think his main crimes are conspiring(1) to delete evidence(2) (obstruction). I'm not sure what "wire fraud" is for — maybe just by virtue of (1) and (2) being done online instead of by phone, letter, or in person.
Re:Three Charged in Fatal Kansas ‘Swatting’ Attack
by dresstotheleft on Thursday May 24, 2018 @04:54PM
(#17148313)
Sounds like he knew the address he gave was going to be swatted and intentionally gave a valid address of someone else. A rational person would have just not answered the question.
He gave a different address to avoid being swatted himself. It is now "conspiracy, wire fraud, and obstruction of justice" to exercise one's instinct of self-preservation?
Can someone with a better handle of the law than myself explain how Gaskill's actions are unlawful?