Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t...
by dbt00 on Thursday May 24, 2018 @03:42PM
(#17147567)
This was discussed extensively here after the event happened. It's not pitch black around there and a number of people have recorded videos driving at night through that exact area and the entire road is well lit enough to see a person with a bike on the road. The low-fidelity CCD video Uber posted in the immediate aftermath is not representative of human vision or (apparently) the sensors that Uber had on the vehicle.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t...
by ScottBurson on Thursday May 24, 2018 @04:55PM
(#17148326)
Right, and I said exactly the same thing elsewhere [0], but I still think she was taking a big chance by being so oblivious. A 45mph speed limit means some people will be doing 55. Stroll casually across a roadway like that enough times, and you will eventually force a driver to swerve around you at high speed or make a panic stop or at the very least blast you with the horn.
I can't imagine doing what she did — even thoroughly stoned, as she may have been (she tested positive for methamphetamine and marijuana), I would have more sense of self-preservation than that.