Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t...
by ScottBurson on Thursday May 24, 2018 @03:01PM
(#17147175)
Yeah, eye contact is a very important signal. Maybe there needs to be some specialized hardware to detect eyes and determine the direction they're looking in.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t...
by beenBoutIT on Thursday May 24, 2018 @04:13PM
(#17147901)
Good idea, although suicidal or oblivious/impaired pedestrians might fail to make eye-contact.
Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t...
by ScottBurson on Thursday May 24, 2018 @04:59PM
(#17148357)
Well, exactly. Those are the ones you slow down for.
Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t...
by beenBoutIT on Friday June 01, 2018 @01:28PM
(#17207745)
I like it. This 'jumping in front of cabs' thing is huge in Russia and it'd be cool if AI could prevent that here.
Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t...
by naasking on Thursday May 24, 2018 @03:36PM
(#17147499)
We use eye contact because we can't infer what another person is thinking and we can't react quickly enough to their actual movements at car speeds. This latter isn't the case with automated vehicles, so eye contact shouldn't be necessary, as long as you get the vector algorithms right.