News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t... by bmelton on Thursday May 24, 2018 @11:48AM (#17145153)
I don't have experience with self-driving cars, Uber or Volvo safety systems, but my Jeep's backup collision prevention often slams the brakes if I'm backing up and the camera detects potholes, oil stains, or irregular painted lines in the parking lot.

If any of the systems are vulnerable to any such false positives, and equipped to enable emergency braking to avoid them, even on the highway, it's not hard to imagine why they might be disabled, especially during testing phases.

I think it's fair to say that at this early stage in product development, there's probably no 'always right' answer for how to handle a given obstacle without considering locality, driving speed, road conditions, likelihood of false positives and negatives, etc.

Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t... by wilsonnb on Thursday May 24, 2018 @12:22PM (#17145546)
They shouldn't be testing on public roads and highways then.
Re:Uber Self-Driving Car That Struck Pedestrian Wasn’t Set t... by repler on Thursday May 24, 2018 @04:01PM (#17147742)
Yeah mine does that too. I wish they had a sensitivity option like they do with the forward collision sensors.

Hey there's an idea for Uber, maybe instead of disabling the forward collision system entirely they could just decrease the sensitivity to lessen false positives (like in our Jeeps)?