Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by TeMPOraL on Thursday May 24, 2018 @10:01AM
(#17144027)
> People in prison sometimes enjoy the opportunity they have to focus on self improvement without the stress of having to make money for food/shelter.
If not for the criminal record being a huge factor in job applications later, I'd consider low-security prison to be a pretty good way of getting a sabbatical. It's almost like basic income.
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by whatshisface on Thursday May 24, 2018 @02:41PM
(#17146998)
That's why "prison is punishment" is supported by some people - if there should exist a social self-improvement program, shouldn't we be giving it to those whose behaviors we want to encourage?
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by TeMPOraL on Friday May 25, 2018 @01:13AM
(#17150789)
I think the issue here really is that regular life became so fucked up that prison seems like a better option. Isolation from participating in society should be punishment on its own, but it isn't, given how the participation looks for most people.
Reminds me of that time I remember from my childhood, when my dad had a friend in a hospital, and would go on ranting about how that friend has much worse food and entertainment than a typical prisoner...
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by pc86 on Thursday May 24, 2018 @10:22AM
(#17144212)
In my state at least it's only for 7 years and only felonies or financial crimes. So you could always commit some non-financial misdemeanor and refuse to do any pretrial diversion program if you wanted, I guess.
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by overcast on Thursday May 24, 2018 @09:51AM
(#17143937)
Considering submarines and prisons historically aren't coed, I'd say space travel fares a bit better for basic human needs.
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by monkeynotes on Thursday May 24, 2018 @10:37AM
(#17144355)
Same sex relationships in prisons and subs aside, I actually think intimate relationships between a confined team that works and lives together is a bad idea. The team needs to depend on each other hugely and having the emotional demands of a intimate relationship could make things pretty difficult for those involved directly or indirectly.
Obviously relationships will develop regardless, you put people together they are going to do stuff. It's just a another challenge, in my mind, rather than an advantage.
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by overcast on Thursday May 24, 2018 @10:40AM
(#17144379)
No different than sex in the workplace, clearly not a good idea, obviously it's going to happen. You hang out with someone long enough, they start being attractive.
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by rdrey on Thursday May 24, 2018 @12:41PM
(#17145770)
Gimlet Media has a fun podcast following a year-long mock space mission. It explores the topic of relationships in a confined space, too: https://www.gimletmedia.com/the-habitat
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by yomly on Thursday May 24, 2018 @09:50AM
(#17143921)
Do the subs not have internet access or comms to outside world?
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by adrianN on Thursday May 24, 2018 @10:00AM
(#17144014)
Nuclear subs predate the Internet and I suppose you also want to limit your non-internet comm activity when sitting somewhere in the ocean waiting for a Russian first strike.
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by roywiggins on Thursday May 24, 2018 @10:04AM
(#17144056)
Radio waves don't work great under the oceans.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_with_submarine...
Re:NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
by beamatronic on Thursday May 24, 2018 @11:20AM
(#17144851)
They do indeed perform a “sync” when they surface briefly.
Surely being on a craft in deep space is not that much different to being on a nuclear sub for months and months on end, smaller I guess.