Re:Why you need IPv6
by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Thursday May 24, 2018 @02:13AM
(#17141488)
NAT is not a layer of security. At all. A billion layers of no security is still no security.
(And actually, NAT is a negative contribution to security as it hides the lack of a firewall when it isn't there or doesn't work, which would be trivial to detect without NAT.)
Yes, for you and for attackers. Security strategies require layers, since no one layer can be depended upon to stand on its own. Removing NAT is removing a layer of security. Suddenly your firewall has to stand on its own. Good luck!
Edit: Why is my comment bad?