Re:Cisco warns 500,000 routers have been hacked in suspected...
by remingtonc on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @12:18PM
(#17135360)
Technical breakdown at https://blog.talosintelligence.com/2018/05/VPNFilter.html - "While the list may not be complete, the known devices affected by VPNFilter are Linksys, MikroTik, NETGEAR and TP-Link networking equipment in the small and home office (SOHO) space, as well at QNAP network-attached storage (NAS) devices."
Re:Cisco warns 500,000 routers have been hacked in suspected...
by thephyber on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @02:02PM
(#17136418)
There is a difference between Russian state-owned media and one of many US-based but privately-owned news companies.
Answer to your question[1]. It looks more level-headed than your insinuation, but certainly targeted at undermining the US's (White House, Pentagon, NSA/other intel agencies, Congress, legislators, think tanks) authority in the cyber realm.
Re:Cisco warns 500,000 routers have been hacked in suspected...
by mindslight on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @12:56PM
(#17135715)
Hopefully, having converged on this Schelling point of "Russian attack!", the so-called cyber [0] intelligence industry will have soon rendered itself moot.
Re:Cisco warns 500,000 routers have been hacked in suspected...
by mr_overalls on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @12:48PM
(#17135640)
> We are unsure of the particular exploit used in any given case, but most devices targeted, particularly in older versions, have known public exploits or default credentials that make compromise relatively straightforward.
Granted, this info is coming from Cisco, but it looks like no back door is necessary in this case.
Re:Cisco warns 500,000 routers have been hacked in suspected...
by thephyber on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @01:54PM
(#17136343)
I'm curious which company you work at such that every person in every department is 100% on the same page and adheres to the same conspiracy and never breaks from the corporate message.
We all know they all do it. Is it just news because it’s the Russians this time?
Answer to your question[1]. It looks more level-headed than your insinuation, but certainly targeted at undermining the US's (White House, Pentagon, NSA/other intel agencies, Congress, legislators, think tanks) authority in the cyber realm.
[1] http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fsputniknews.com%2F...
[0] a/s/l ?
Granted, this info is coming from Cisco, but it looks like no back door is necessary in this case.