News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease by Faaak on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @10:10AM (#17134289)
As a non-native English speaker, I find the conclusion sentence very confusing: "Among Chinese adults, a moderate level of egg consumption (up to <1 egg/day) was significantly associated with lower risk of CVD, largely independent of other risk factors."

Don that mean that it's best to eat a lot or less eggs ?

Re:Associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease by Someone1234 on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @10:13AM (#17134307)
Their study showed more eggs MAY reduce some Cardiovascular disease. The language used is pretty typical for academic studies, but isn't that easy to read without familiarity.

I would be interested to know, for the people not eating at least one egg a day, what were those meals instead? It could be a case of "an egg is healthier than [Unknown]" instead of "an egg makes you healthier."

Re:Associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease by amrx101 on Thursday May 24, 2018 @01:04AM (#17141231)
I second that. had me confused for a while. I think more than the English, its the way scientific and academic papers are written.
Re:Associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease by your-nanny on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @10:12AM (#17134302)
Confusing to native speakers too. But I think the context is comparison with those who don't eat eggs at all.
Re:Associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease by mistersquid on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @10:14AM (#17134311)
One paraphrase of the quote you provide is "Among Chinese adults, consuming less than 1 egg per day is associated with lower risk of CVD".

An even simpler paraphrase is "eating less than 1 egg a day is associated with lower CVD".

To answer your question directly, one can reasonably infer from the quote you provide that it is best to eat fewer eggs.

EDIT: change quantifying adjective from "less" to "fewer"

Re:Associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease by tgb on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @10:19AM (#17134358)
No that's exactly wrong. Consumption of eggs was positively correlated with better CVD outcomes but they only had data to conclude that this holds up to an amount less than 1 egg per day. People with .76 fared better than those with .29 per day.
Re:Associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease by mistersquid on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @10:31AM (#17134466)
Thank you for clarifying. Even this native English speaker was confused.

In my partial defense, concluding something like "eating up to but less than one egg per day is inversely associated with CVD risk" is odd and somewhat defies common sense.

My incorrect translation is a good reminder for me that scientific language doesn't always easily translate into conversational language.

EDIT: remove repeated word