News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign by throwaway_98554 on Saturday May 19, 2018 @03:48PM (#17109413)
Judging by the time card, I would bet multiple individuals are using this account. And they're probably getting paid to do it.
Re:A Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign by GuB-42 on Saturday May 19, 2018 @07:52PM (#17110389)
I think it is the opposite. It looks more like an obsessed individual than a group.

What makes me say that is that it is extremely regular from 8am to 10pm, 7 days a week. It looks a lot like a single person waking hours. If people did that as a day job, it would be more like 9am to 5pm, monday to friday. During their free time, it would be the opposite. For an international team, we would see activity around the clock. Hard to match such a schedule with a team.

Re:A Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign by bhouston on Saturday May 19, 2018 @04:29PM (#17109596)
Many wikipedians are obsessive types. Also why would multiple people pretend to be one. Groups are more effective than individuals on Wikipedia.
Re:A Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign by throwaway_98554 on Saturday May 19, 2018 @04:41PM (#17109627)
Because many people would get upset if "my-political-party" was hiring team of editors to change the wiki articles.

And if they are indeed getting paid, the organisation might have an important turnover. By using a single account (or multiple shared accounts; I doubt there's only one), you keep the 'prestige' you have built.

Your 1 week old new recruit can edit texts left and right while most people think it's a legit old wikipedians tidying stuff up.

Re:A Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign by hexane360 on Sunday May 20, 2018 @01:05AM (#17111335)
Of course, 1 top 1000 user might be more effective than 2 top 10000 users (with half the edits each).
Re:A Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign by endorphone on Saturday May 19, 2018 @05:23PM (#17109805)
Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but the article seems to surmise who the person is, explaining the strong and self-destructive attacks on George Galloway in particular. That person has a lifestyle and apparent behaviors that would explain the singular focus.
Re:A Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign by burfog on Saturday May 19, 2018 @03:57PM (#17109460)
I conclude the opposite. He takes nights off, but doesn't take weekends off. This isn't employment. It's an obsession.

He managed to tick off some people who have the opposite political opinion. Those people also edit wikipedia with a personal agenda, and they are unhappy to be up against effective opposition.

Re:A Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign by noobermin on Saturday May 19, 2018 @04:01PM (#17109473)
The purpose of wikipedia, at least in the abstract, is to present NPOV information. You don't achieve that by having people with opposite political opinions war with each other.