Hard Multi-Tenancy in Kubernetes

Posted by etxm on Friday May 18, 2018 @10:21AM
from the blog.jessfraz.com dept.

( 3 comments | 41 points | on HN )

Re:Hard Multi-Tenancy in Kubernetes by dsnuh on Friday May 18, 2018 @05:26PM (#17105079)

Just me or does this read like the proposed solution to move the security boundary from cluster to namespace is to have a cluster per namespace?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hard Multi-Tenancy in Kubernetes by nassyweazy on Sunday May 20, 2018 @04:47AM (#17111871)

Yeah, I don't quite understand it either as it'd be pretty similar to have one process per PID ns at the operating system level.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hard Multi-Tenancy in Kubernetes by emmelaich on Friday May 18, 2018 @09:56PM (#17106209)

If you get blocked from the Google doc proposal, strip off the /edit at the end.

[ Parent | on HN ]