News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GDPR: Don't Panic by frockington on Friday May 18, 2018 @09:40AM (#17101337)
Not for non-violent misdemeanors. Unless you're a flagrant offender you will normally be slapped don the wrist and given a stern lecture in the form of a class. Source: was in a fraternity in the US where literally nothing bad happened to anyone I knew with a misdemeanor outside of a fine and class
Re:GDPR: Don't Panic by Clubber on Friday May 18, 2018 @10:01AM (#17101510)
A lot of companies won't hire you if you have a criminal record of any kind. Some won't even hire you if you have any record of arrest, regardless of conviction.

Which fraternity?

Re:GDPR: Don't Panic by frockington on Friday May 18, 2018 @10:14AM (#17101622)
If the court seals the record its nearly impossible for anyone but government agencies to discover
Re:GDPR: Don't Panic by dragonwriter on Friday May 18, 2018 @12:26PM (#17102701)
> If the court seals the record its nearly impossible for anyone but government agencies to discover

No, it is not, because background check and other third-party intelligence firms aren't purely reactive now, they have and use tools to proactively vacuum up public records and maintain their own DBs. After-the-fact sealing of arrest records or expunging of convictions has no effect on data that is already in third-party hands.

Re:GDPR: Don't Panic by frockington on Friday May 18, 2018 @12:33PM (#17102763)
Never knew this, so is it that just no employer cares enough about minor misdemeanors or the cost of doing so makes it not worthwhile? I've never heard of anyone getting a job offer taken back because of a minor misdemaonor
Re:GDPR: Don't Panic by baq on Friday May 18, 2018 @04:05PM (#17104561)
exactly what the GDPR helps you with...
Re:GDPR: Don't Panic by Clubber on Friday May 18, 2018 @10:28AM (#17101720)
Yes, but that costs money and not all states do it. My state has a fully searchable arrest database with mugshots.
Re:GDPR: Don't Panic by zajd on Friday May 18, 2018 @10:27AM (#17101713)
wasn't there just a story about background check startups finding these records and using them?