Re:GDPR: Removing Monal from the EU
by joering2 on Thursday May 17, 2018 @06:11PM
(#17096507)
I spent near to $10,000 in 6 lawyers 2 in usa 4 in different european countries and all wrote detailed report for me negating what you just said. IP is one of the most PII identifiable elements of an internet user. Exception is when you can prove such IP is a merely a proxy. please get some other lawyers opinion!!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Note that I didn't say IPs aren't PII; I said they don't count as long as you are collecting them for the specific purpose of security and don't have any way to identify the person using that IP. Pretty much by definition that is not PII.
That came from the legal departments from our German, UK, and French entities.
You contradict yourself, either its PII or not. Common understanding in the industry is that it is. Purpose of security doesn't change if its PII or not. Although security/auditing might allow to hold on for longer because you need the PII as a feature (which you should be transparent about). For pure telemetry you don't need it, I'd claim.
IPs can be PII under certain circumstances, but not the ones I laid out.
> Purpose of security doesn't change if its PII or not.
Security is the legitimate interest, an important part of collection under GDPR.
Re:GDPR: Removing Monal from the EU
by kasey_junk on Thursday May 17, 2018 @06:45PM
(#17096787)
PII is not the standard for GDPR compliance.
That's correct, but PII is what the person I replied to was talking about.
Re:GDPR: Removing Monal from the EU
by raverbashing on Thursday May 17, 2018 @06:30PM
(#17096682)
Here's your problem, you have 6 lawyers.
If you're too worried about this, remove the last octet from the IP or and/or it with a mask. And especially don't associate the IP with the user (by default you can't find out who's the user only by IP).