Re:The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
by zippitydoodah68 on Thursday May 17, 2018 @10:18AM
(#17091390)
It's not that sysadmins cannot do the work you are rightfully proud of. If there are two basic things that differentiates your statements from those of a traditional sysadmin it is these.
1. Design. 2. Discipline.
Where these two values are dispensable long term devops and the new world shine through. I've worked in both worlds and the only mistake is assuming one size fits all.
Re:The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
by zippitydoodah68 on Thursday May 17, 2018 @01:25PM
(#17093346)
In general you seem like an absurd sort of creature. Neither here nor there. Bragging about your facility and business velocity. Everything you claim to do sysadmins were doing in 98 and with equal velocity and adequate coverage.
There were guys like this that were there before and helped everyone along: https://www.computerhope.com/people/don_libes.htm
Re:The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
by mmt on Thursday May 17, 2018 @04:59PM
(#17095710)
At the risk of being too "meta", although I agree with what I believe is your point about good sysadmins having been advancing automation (and otherwise keeping business needs in mind), I worry that you're distracting a reader from that point by what reads as an ad-hominem attack in your first sentence.
I'm still not certain what point you were trying to make with "neithere here nor there", however.
Anyway, the core mission of anybody touching the stack is to enable the business to achieve its goals. Nothing, and I mean nothing, more. "Restricting that environment" is appropriate in some environments, and a number of my clients bring me in to help with that. Facilitating developer velocity--and, yes, developers do tend to like me, because I'm good at this while achieving goals around security and uptime--is appropriate in, probably, more. Pays better, too, even if it shouldn't.