Re:The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
by subway on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @01:08PM
(#17084153)
Also means fat fat contracting gigs for us luddites to clean up after the move-fast-break-shit-gtfo kids.
Re:The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
by mcguire on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @02:06PM
(#17084846)
You know all those people who say, "Never rewrite a project! It'll always fail and take forever and cost too much and..."? I've spend much of the last decade getting paid reasonably well rewriting their projects. (Anyone remember mod_perl 1.x?)
Re:The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
by Tehchops on Thursday May 17, 2018 @10:08AM
(#17091307)
Hey, if you want to take 18 month stints without healthcare to clean up mis-managed "digital transitions" at places like GE, more power to you ;-)
Re:The sad state of sysadmin in the age of containers (2015)
by ConceptJunkie on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @01:17PM
(#17084278)
Hey, if JCL was good enough for IBM, it's good enough for me.
Pretty much. I know several admins who appear to be joining a growing pool of luddites who rail against anything new. They're particularly butt-mad about anyone drawing more salary than them. "DevOps" is their favored totem to direct their ire at.
I used to try and convince them otherwise, but it turned out to be a completely futile waste of time. At the end of the day, persistent FUD just means a more lucrative job market for the engineers who are pragmatic and fearless enough to give an honest try at making the newer paradigms work for their employers.