News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on State-of-the-art text classification with universal language models. Parent comment

Re:State-of-the-art text classification with universal langu... by ramanan on Tuesday May 15, 2018 @08:05PM (#17078942)
Got it. I was looking for input on how generalizable (the ability of weights to change/adapt) when the training labeled data is 100x smaller than the initial pre-training dataset?

Also, I don't understand the need to be so defensive though and the relevance between my employer and my post?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:State-of-the-art text classification with universal langu... by JPKab on Tuesday May 15, 2018 @09:15PM (#17079261)
When you use the word disingenuous, you invited the response you got. Totally uncalled for to write that.

His response on your employer was likely driven by an assumption that you viewed this as free, open source competition to your product, and thus the negative comment.

To the OP:. I've find a lot of NLP, and this is phenomenal work.

[ Parent | on HN ]