News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Docker is a dangerous gamble by viraptor on Monday May 14, 2018 @09:19AM (#17065212)
I agree with some points, however:

- No packaging, little doc, etc. "Just use the docker image".

I'll take a project with a dockerfile used for CI over a project with short setup instructions. The first one is less likely to go out of date, or be incorrect. (Ideally it would have both, and a good operations manual. But given only those two, very common choices)

- Docker images are big huge binary you download from internet and run on your server.

I agree this is how most people use it, but you're not forced to use it that way. You can deploy memcached based on 200MB Ubuntu base, or a custom images containing the lsb layout + libc + few devices, totalling ~8MB. The huge images are a documentation/community issue, not a technical one.

Re:Docker is a dangerous gamble by sametmax on Monday May 14, 2018 @10:18AM (#17065721)
Oh yeah, just like leftpad was not a technical issue. But it's still a good analogy of a big problem the JS community has.
Re:Docker is a dangerous gamble by viraptor on Monday May 14, 2018 @05:48PM (#17069741)
I think leftpad was a bit different. Programming in JS you often need some dependencies. You could start from scratch and do everything in your own, but that's a huge time / resources sink. Using docker you can always start from scratch and it's barely any harder than using some huge starting image.