News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Senate has forced a vote to restore net neutrality by jiojfdsal3 on Thursday May 10, 2018 @08:14AM (#17038147)
How do you convince network giants like IBM, Intel, Cisco, Nokia, Qualcomm, Broadcom, Juniper, D-Link, among others, that net neutrality regulations are a bad idea? They currently support what Ajit Pai is doing. They have even have gone as far as crediting his repeals for greater investment into their network infrastructure.
Re:The Senate has forced a vote to restore net neutrality by Brockenstein on Thursday May 10, 2018 @08:59AM (#17038433)
You probably don't because net neutrality isn't an automatic win for everyone. Some companies clearly benefit from the repeal. They do have incentive to invest in their networks when they can monetize it every which way, it's now a feature they can charge for...

Except maybe for a PR tidal wave so huge that anyone who opposes net neutrality is driven out of business, I don't see how you convince companies to go against their own interests.

Re:The Senate has forced a vote to restore net neutrality by shane_siebken on Thursday May 10, 2018 @09:04AM (#17038469)
You don't - you can only change the rules of the game so their interests are set in line with public opinion, or environmental standards, or safety practices, or whatever else.
Re:The Senate has forced a vote to restore net neutrality by dhimes on Thursday May 10, 2018 @11:20AM (#17039637)
^^ Right answer. Board members will be upset if companies don't do every thing they can to increase profits, including "persuading" members of Congress and swaying public opinion. Our job, as "civilians," is to set the rules of the game the way we want them. The companies won't- unless there is accidental alignment between the company's goals and ours (in this case, small companies may align for example).