Re:California Votes to Require Rooftop Solar Power on New Homes
by sundvor on Thursday May 10, 2018 @05:00AM
(#17037283)
As DSC has been mandatory for a few years now in Australia, this means anyone buying a reasonably new 2nd hand car is going to get this important safety technology.
This is a good thing. You'd be hard pushed to claim it has brought the prices of cars up.
Likewise if all new houses must have solar, it's just going to become the norm and everyone will benefit. Bravo!
I wish Australia had made double glazed windows mandatory (as well as solar panels). Alas, most people (well, at least politicians) have no idea what you're talking about, and prices are way up there.
Re:California Votes to Require Rooftop Solar Power on New Homes
by rconti on Thursday May 10, 2018 @06:26PM
(#17043471)
That was (pretty much) my point. Although you can't claim there's not a cost, it's fairly minimal.
Re:California Votes to Require Rooftop Solar Power on New Homes
by sundvor on Friday May 11, 2018 @11:42PM
(#17052373)
Yep, got that - sought to reinforce it. :)
Re:California Votes to Require Rooftop Solar Power on New Homes
by literallycancer on Thursday May 10, 2018 @08:34AM
(#17038235)
>Likewise if all new houses must have solar, it's just going to become the norm and everyone will benefit. Bravo!
I live in a house built in 1920s. Ever seen someone driving a Model T?
You bought a car for $2k, but it was a used car. The fair comparison might be a Nissan Versa S, the cheapest new car in America at $12,780. Or maybe your car has more features than that, I don't know. That still puts the Model 3 at a multiple of the cost of that car, but hardly to an insane extent. Hell, in California you can, today, with rebates (yes, you have to pay some money up front) buy a new BMW i3 for about $22k. Of course, that's a particularly limited electric car, but then again, it also has features a $12,780 Nissan Versa does not, so you could argue the Versa is also limited.
We're not there yet, but we're getting there.
Actually a better argument from your point would be that the mandatory reverse cameras, airbags, safety cells, safety belts, ABS, etc, make new cars more expensive than they SHOULD be. In many countries you can get a brand new car for way less than $12,780. Of course, it's less safe and pollutes more than the new car you buy in the US, but there's a tradeoff in price.
Then again, that tradeoff trickles down to the used market, and pretty soon you have a $2k used car that HN buyers can buy, which is safer, cleaner, and more fuel efficient than an equivalent used car in a 2nd world country.
Or at least, that's how it works in theory.