News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CloudEvents 0.1 – A common set of metadata to help proces... by polskibus on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @11:14AM (#17021462)
Why did they have to name it cloudevents? What's in it that restricts the use of it to the cloud? Surely you can structure events acc.to this spec without using public cloud.
Re:CloudEvents 0.1 – A common set of metadata to help proces... by djrosanova on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @11:19AM (#17021510)
I would say it's more cloud native than cloud restricted. In the past we used to try to bring things from outside of the cloud into to the cloud, now we're starting to bring things born in the cloud out of the cloud.
Re:CloudEvents 0.1 – A common set of metadata to help proces... by inlined on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @12:09PM (#17022018)
Ironically, the spec under the CloudEvents standard is much less restricted to cloud-based objects than its early working version "open events"

We considered a number of cases where the event source is not addressable software. Heck, your local library can emit a feed of cloud events where the event source is an isbn Uri.

Re:CloudEvents 0.1 – A common set of metadata to help proces... by AndyNemmity on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @11:39AM (#17021727)
Nothing restricts it's usage, it's just that in the naming conversation, with the other names already taken, what domains were available, etc, it was the best option.

I certainly couldn't come up with anything else, and it seemed like the best name from the group.