News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Concorde ‘B’. Parent comment

Re:Concorde ‘B’ by joering2 on Monday May 07, 2018 @04:46PM (#17016347)
[...] it might be assumed that the flying machine which will really fly might be evolved by the combined and continuous efforts of mathematicians and mechanicians in from one million to ten million years--provided, of course, we can meanwhile eliminate such little drawbacks and embarrassments as the existing relation between weight and strength in inorganic materials.

More fun facts: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Incorrect_predictions

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by larkeith on Monday May 07, 2018 @05:46PM (#17016734)
Hence the "if". I certainly hope they will be feasible, but the fact that an alternative may be possible, contingent on the potential creation of currently nonextant materials, is absolutely not a reason to discourage development of supersonic aircraft.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by FiveDegrees on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @07:57PM (#17026397)
That Asimov quote is actually pretty damned close to reality. Why is that exchange, of all things, sitting beside Neville "Peace for our times" Chamberlain?
[ Parent | on HN ]