News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by rwmj on Monday May 07, 2018 @03:53PM (#17015933)
I've said it before, but why are you designing a plane with pilots on board? Automate as far as possible and have a remote control option as backup. It saves space, money (pilots are expensive), and human error.
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by coatmatter on Wednesday May 09, 2018 @08:37AM (#17029309)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0yGOSZUHwA explains why you won't have passenger aircraft without pilots for any conceivable time.

Driverless cars are only mildly succeeding right now because of Amercica's low standards when it comes safety.

Re:Concorde ‘B’ by jen729w on Monday May 07, 2018 @03:57PM (#17015959)
What does the FAA have to say about that?

(Spoiler: “no”.)

Re:Concorde ‘B’ by tajen on Monday May 07, 2018 @04:14PM (#17016106)
Right, massive shortcuts could be taken with no pilot on board (including the awesome $$$ seats in the front row), but that’s a story for another startup with a 20-year runway.
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by JetSpiegel on Monday May 07, 2018 @07:51PM (#17017493)
Just call it Airplane! and have Kareem Abdul-Jabbar do commercials.
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by cardiffspaceman on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @05:27PM (#17025315)
Abdul-Jabbar could say something awesome about dragging someone or something back and forth across the Atlantic, which hopefully people would understand was a movie reference.
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by ghaff on Monday May 07, 2018 @06:58PM (#17017156)
Pilots are pretty cheap relative to the cost of a trans-Atlantic flight. And you’re going to want some Captain type person even if you don’t need them as a pilot.
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by reaperducer on Monday May 07, 2018 @06:27PM (#17016984)
We can't get the cars to drive themselves in 2D space without killing people. What makes you think that 3D is going to be easier?
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by Piezoid on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @08:01AM (#17020324)
Sometimes the "curse of dimensionality" is a good thing :)
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by stephen_g on Monday May 07, 2018 @08:12PM (#17017644)
I’d actually say it’s a lot easier - there aren’t any crash barriers, planes are spaced far further apart, etc.

But at the same time, I’d never want to fly in a passenger plane without a pilot, because when emergency situations happen, autopilots usually can’t handle it and need intervention. When the engine on QF32 exploded, the pilots had to do checks and make judgements on something like 200 different error messages before they could land! Since so many of the plane’s systems were damaged by the explosion, a lot of this may not have been possible remotely.

And the stakes are much higher when an uncaught sensor error or something can mean flying into the ground from 30,000 feet - unlike a train (the only thing that actually has a good safety record running driverless so far) you can’t just stop in an emergency!