News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by BinaryIdiot on Monday May 07, 2018 @02:24PM (#17015093)
It's my understanding that, initially, it'll have to be over water but once it's proven safe they can get approval to fly over land. I don't know what that entails but that was my understanding of it last time I looked into it.

A NYC-SF or DC-SF route would be freaking amazing.

Re:Concorde ‘B’ by jessriedel on Monday May 07, 2018 @11:36PM (#17018625)
> but once it's proven safe they can get approval to fly over land

The prohibition on supersonic airliners over land is about noise, not safety.

Re:Concorde ‘B’ by sailfast on Monday May 07, 2018 @02:30PM (#17015142)
When Boom was first posted here I recall the narrative also including a lot of drag dynamics that would reduce the "boom" which would allow for more feasible overland routes / less noise pollution. Not sure where that sits now - I don't see it as much in their PR copy.
Re:Concorde ‘B’ by gsnedders on Monday May 07, 2018 @03:23PM (#17015657)
It's still their plan, AFAIK, but the regulatory hurdles to let them do it probably means it's a lot further off than overwater flights.