News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:96-Year-Old Secretary Quietly Amasses Fortune, Then Donat... by throwaway76543 on Sunday May 06, 2018 @11:52PM (#17010295)
Nothing's guaranteed but the odds are very, very good. If you invest in a diversified index fund like VTI then 7% is a reasonable average growth estimate.

Investing a lump sum is a risk -- you'd cut your fortune nearly in half if you invested in 2008. This isn't an issue for most folks who save over time.

Frankly, the largest thing stopping folks from investing is financial literacy. The second largest thing is probably lack of disposable income.

Re:96-Year-Old Secretary Quietly Amasses Fortune, Then Donat... by MoBattah on Monday May 07, 2018 @12:22AM (#17010373)
You're completely right. Grabbing some Vanguard index ETF and dollar cost averaging is definitely what I (and others) should be doing.

I'd bet 7% YoY over 20 years is conservative.

Re:96-Year-Old Secretary Quietly Amasses Fortune, Then Donat... by betterworldb on Monday May 07, 2018 @08:23AM (#17012158)
Typically the 7% number is used for after inflation
Re:96-Year-Old Secretary Quietly Amasses Fortune, Then Donat... by TeMPOraL on Monday May 07, 2018 @10:33AM (#17013027)
> financial literacy

How does one gain it? Everywhere I look, there's so many scam artists and so much confusion that I don't know what's true / reasonable anymore.

Re:96-Year-Old Secretary Quietly Amasses Fortune, Then Donat... by ryandrake on Monday May 07, 2018 @12:42AM (#17010440)
Thank you. Every HN thread about the stock market seems to ignore pr downplay risk. If the stock market was really risk-free everyone would be able to retire a millionaire.
Re:96-Year-Old Secretary Quietly Amasses Fortune, Then Donat... by jjeaff on Monday May 07, 2018 @01:54AM (#17010653)
At least historically, there is no reason everyone couldn't.

There is no 30 year period in the history of the s&p 500 that returns less than 7% if I remember correctly.

Re:96-Year-Old Secretary Quietly Amasses Fortune, Then Donat... by barry-cotter on Monday May 07, 2018 @08:47AM (#17012259)
Just imagine what you’d have gotten out of investing in the German, Russian, Chinese or Rhodesian stock exchanges in 1900. I don’t know what happened to people who were heavily invested in the French stock exchange in 1939 but I doubt it was good either. I wouldn’t want to be in the South Korean or Japanese stock exchange if North Korea does anything. You may think war is unlikely but so did a lot of people in 1913. The USA may be the safest available what with the oceans to the East and West and the client states to North and South but it’s not like a civil war would be unprecedented.
Re:96-Year-Old Secretary Quietly Amasses Fortune, Then Donat... by ascorbic on Monday May 07, 2018 @01:36AM (#17010598)
Most people don't invest in ultra-cheap index trackers though. They pay high fees for funds that can under-perform the market.
Re:96-Year-Old Secretary Quietly Amasses Fortune, Then Donat... by exolymph on Monday May 07, 2018 @03:22AM (#17010923)
To be fair, index funds are a relatively new thing.