Re:Subscription Hell
by madeofpalk on Sunday May 06, 2018 @04:28PM
(#17008327)
Seems weird to call Apple out for planned obsolescence considering their devices are generally supported by the manufacturer for considerably longer than the alternatives.
Re:Subscription Hell
by AndrewKemendo on Sunday May 06, 2018 @09:00PM
(#17009666)
It's not directly comparable, however the two year upgrade is what they really want people to do - after all it was pretty definitive that they were degrading experience as a trade off on the battery issue.
Even Apple somewhat relies on this, except it's been in 2 year intervals. It's the point of so called "planned obsolescence."
So if you're an indie developer, you only have a few options.
1.Go through the rat trap of doing ads and trying to grow a huge userbase with marketing etc..., which everyone hates but most tolerate because it's free.
2. Charge a 1 time fee and hope that you price it right to support long term development and sustainment, knowing that you'll probably limit your market significantly.
3. Charge a recurring low(er) fee and draw a balance between losing a lot of very price sensitive people and having to run a marketing campaign and ad system.
No good option there but subscription seems to have the most benefits. By the way, everything needs upkeep.