News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The economics of artificial intelligence by TheOtherHobbes on Saturday May 05, 2018 @05:13PM (#17003855)
"There’s some number at which Amazon might think, “We are now sufficiently good at predicting what you want to buy. Why are we waiting for you to shop at all? We’ll just ship it.”

This is one of the most politically, economically, and psychologically tone deaf things I've read this year.

Re:The economics of artificial intelligence by kristianov on Saturday May 05, 2018 @07:33PM (#17004462)
A better way to put it is: “We are now sufficiently good at predicting ... We’ll just ship it to the warehouse closest to you, so in case you buy it, you get faster shipping.” To me, that's value of AI.
Re:The economics of artificial intelligence by lovemenot on Saturday May 05, 2018 @07:16PM (#17004400)
Hypotheticals don't have to be reasonable or realistic to serve their purpose.

The writer's purpose here was to show the difference between incremental and transformational business change, by stressing baked-in assumptions beyond their natural breakng point. In that sense they succeeded.