News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Big companies collude to hold down pay. by scott_s on Thursday September 16, 2010 @09:46PM (#1699744)
I've personally felt (as a consumer) that tech & internet development have stagnated in the last year or two, notwithstanding the existence of new things.

I can't reconcile those two clauses.

Re:Big companies collude to hold down pay. by anigbrowl on Thursday September 16, 2010 @10:59PM (#1699931)
Oh, sorry! I meant that some people are innovating, but that the overall trend has been towards sameness and value extraction. Many superficially novel offerings are only stylistically different.

It's hard to articulate; I feel like I've seen the pattern before at least twice, and soon after there's a game-changing disruption. The two previous instances would the browser and web services. This time? Adaptive structural decomposition.

Re:Big companies collude to hold down pay. by SkyMarshal on Friday September 17, 2010 @05:08AM (#1700527)
"Adaptive structural decomposition."

Congratulations on stumping all of DuckDuckGo, Google, and my own linguistic inferential ability with that term.

My curiosity is piqued, might I ask for an elaboration?

Edit: Wait a sec, found something, this it?

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1458841

Re:Big companies collude to hold down pay. by anigbrowl on Friday September 17, 2010 @02:48PM (#1702306)
No, though it's that sort of thing. I came up with the term because it seemed to describe the key process at work in future software - at least, the kind which I expect/hope to see - and which depends on a sort of weak AI.

It needs an essay-length answer, and I'm not quite ready to do it yet. And at that, it's conceptual, addressing my subjective view of content/interaction problems in different domains, and my equally subjective view that they're isomorphic to some other technical problems for which we have or are converging on solutions. Some might find it aggressively different, others a handwaving restatement of ideas that already exist. I don't want to be a tease, so rather than saying more I'll start making notes this weekend.

Re:Big companies collude to hold down pay. by lionhearted on Thursday September 16, 2010 @11:31PM (#1700013)
> I meant that some people are innovating, but that the overall trend has been towards sameness and value extraction. Many superficially novel offerings are only stylistically different.

I think you're half-right, but the most exciting thing happening right now in technology are some of the expensive cool technologies turning into commodities. This doesn't have the "wow!" factor of new breakthroughs, but is an important step. Soon-ish (10 years?) everyone will own a smartphone, which means a computer in your pocket. That's pretty cool. Also, the mobile web stuff is pretty cool, and the ability to get high end scalable cloud hosting for relatively cheap is cool.

These aren't major breakthroughs the way social news was, the way better search was, the way better email was, etc. I do see less of those, but new competition and collapsing prices in cool technologies is a really good thing, even though it doesn't set off the wow factor so much.

Re:Big companies collude to hold down pay. by gabrielroth on Thursday September 16, 2010 @09:56PM (#1699770)
I think the poster above is suggesting that the new things, though extant, are not sufficiently many/various/innovative/useful/delightful to constitute satisfying progress.