Re:Tesla Plunges After a Conference Call
by danso on Thursday May 03, 2018 @01:31PM
(#16987926)
Letting one person ask 10 questions means less time for other investors to ask their own individual questions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
This is true, but retail investors don’t typically interact at this level. At the beginning of the call Elon said that they would let the earnings call run until they were out of questions. That clearly didn’t happen...
To be fair (edit: figuratively, to state a favorable viewpoint on Elon's decisiont to give more time to one person) he was asking excellent/interesting/challenging questions and it was really interesting to me to hear Elon's answers.
I think Elon might have done well to be less brusque with the more run of the mill questions but I really enjoyed listing to the long exchange there
Re:Tesla Plunges After a Conference Call
by hcknwscommenter on Thursday May 03, 2018 @04:09PM
(#16989438)
> he was asking excellent/interesting/challenging questions and it was really interesting to me to hear Elon's answers.
In the context of an investor call, which are supposed to convey an investment thesis for the company, I cannot agree. The questions were too pie-in-the-sky to have any bearing on whether TSLA equity/debt/or hybrid have an attractive relative value. It seemed to me that Elon was simply running out the clock.
Re:Tesla Plunges After a Conference Call
by devmunchies on Thursday May 03, 2018 @02:11PM
(#16988292)
> To be fair he was asking excellent/interesting/challenging questions and it was really interesting to me to hear Elon's answers
thats the opposite of being fair, but unfair is fine sometimes.
>thats the opposite of being fair, but unfair is fine sometimes.
fair point ;)