Re:Running FFmpeg on AWS Lambda for 1.9% the Cost of AWS Ela...
by hangtwenty on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @04:21PM
(#16980808)
Yes! If one uses something like Kubeless[1], you have something like AWS Lambda, but where the backend is Kubernetes rather than AWS. Yes you're still on a framework, but it's a vendor-agnostic, open-source one. There are some other attempts at similar things, too. I am partial to this one for now.
Re:Running FFmpeg on AWS Lambda for 1.9% the Cost of AWS Ela...
by hardwaresofton on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @10:34PM
(#16982943)
This is what I see as the true power of kubernetes -- once people start developing high quality (hopefully open source) applications for platforms like kubernetes, providers like AWS should lose their "value-added" benefits, and be reduced to more like colo providers, maybe offering 24/7 support as well.
That will be when the ubiquitous cloud truly arrives -- run on whatever provider in the sky, and as long as they run kubernetes you can run your workloads there.
Re:Running FFmpeg on AWS Lambda for 1.9% the Cost of AWS Ela...
by checker on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @06:23PM
(#16981685)
At a pure level, Lambda "integration" is essentially an interface for passing in runtime arguments+environment to your application. If you're concerned about lock-in, you can write or integrate another entry point that executes your function on on-prem Tomcat or whatever other environment (Cloud Functions?) you want to run in.
The much harder challenge would be provisioning thousands of on-prem servers to handle the load, but I wouldn't necessarily qualify a dependency on cloud-like autoscaling as lock-in.
I guess the lock-in might come as you unwittingly couple yourself to the intricacies of the rest of AWS's offerings as your app architecture grows more complex.
Re:Running FFmpeg on AWS Lambda for 1.9% the Cost of AWS Ela...
by ty_a on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @04:21PM
(#16980811)
Well there's iron.io (which just got bought by Oracle) and there are several FaaS projects for Kubernetes such as: OpenFaaS and Kubeless.
Edit: OpenFaaS can run on Nomad as well apparently: https://www.hashicorp.com/blog/functions-as-a-service-with-n...
Re:Running FFmpeg on AWS Lambda for 1.9% the Cost of AWS Ela...
by polskibus on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @04:25PM
(#16980844)
https://openwhisk.apache.org/ backed by IBM AFAIK, but not only.
Re:Running FFmpeg on AWS Lambda for 1.9% the Cost of AWS Ela...
by 2RTZZSro on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @07:27PM
(#16982053)
Next installment: "Running a private cloud under my desk for 1% the cost of AWS".
Re:Running FFmpeg on AWS Lambda for 1.9% the Cost of AWS Ela...
by kwillets on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @08:04PM
(#16982224)
I'm thinking of writing a book about tower-under-desk computing. It's surprisingly common.
Re:Running FFmpeg on AWS Lambda for 1.9% the Cost of AWS Ela...
by yaronhaviv on Saturday May 05, 2018 @08:08AM
(#17001462)
check: https://github.com/nuclio/nuclio high-perf serverless runs over (standalone) docker or Kubernetes or Cloud services
Is there any effort to on-prem lambda stuff yet? I know it's a moving target, but I wouldn't recommend getting into cloud stuff you can't migrate out of.