News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on IBM is not doing "cognitive computing" with Watson (2016). Parent comment

Re:IBM is not doing "cognitive computing" with Watson (2016) by akvadrako on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @03:18AM (#16965139)
I don't have strong opinions about pen computing, but the comment I replied to was just giving a bad impression of the tech in the early 2000s. It worked quite well actually.

Since he didn't specify the timeframe, I gave him the benefit of the doubt and thought it he was talking about before my time.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:IBM is not doing "cognitive computing" with Watson (2016) by ItsMe000001 on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @04:37AM (#16965423)
> It worked quite well actually.

Apart from the problems mentioned in the comment you replied to. You don't seem to have a point other than being contrarian (as a state).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:IBM is not doing "cognitive computing" with Watson (2016) by akvadrako on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @07:16AM (#16966079)
The commenter said that handwriting recognition didn't work well. But, having tried it myself, I know that's not true. My point is to share that data.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:IBM is not doing "cognitive computing" with Watson (2016) by kazagistar on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @11:02AM (#16967546)
Not sure why you would ask for advice on a downvoted comment, but then just argue against the response.
[ Parent | on HN ]