Sorry, I wasnt reading closely enough. I did not realize that the site might have been just affiliate links. I think affiliate links are not much of an issue, personally, mainly because they don't rely on tracking.

But many ads are those that track you across pages and use many of the same stuff as Facebook to show you products. So if you're uncomfortable with that, it's important to put pressure on that.

If he were just throwing up Google AdWords /FB ads or whatever he would be participating in an ecosystem that is unethical for many. It's helping to support a good cause, but wouldn't it be nice to get good things without contributing to an unethical system in the process?

>>If he were just throwing up Google AdWords /FB ads or whatever he would be participating in an ecosystem that is unethical for many.

But likely in complete compliance with GDPR... As Adwords and FB Ads would be in compliance.

That is the entire point of laws like GDPR, it has nothing to do with User privacy and everything to do with Ensure their can be no competition to Adwords or FB in the future.

It's mind-boggling that people are trying to cast some Amazon affiliate links into a nefarious invasion of privacy. On the advertising scale, from 1 to late-90s, I'm-probably-going-to-catch-a-virus-from-a-shady-ActiveX-component, this is maybe a two.

If all the author of the article was doing was Amazon affiliate links, then the entire premise of the article is unjustified.