News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by orf on Sunday April 29, 2018 @08:58PM (#16954940)
Arguing the EU is overreaching in demanding basic protections its citizens data, and that the only people who support it are... rioters (?) is a pretty vacuous and idiotic argument to make.

If you're making something that stores personally identifiable information outside of what you need, and don't care enough to secure it or offer ways for a user to manage that data then yes, take it down. Good riddance.

Or, just don't store that data in the first place. If you're storing usernames, passwords and the like then you have nothing to worry about.

Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by closeparen on Sunday April 29, 2018 @09:26PM (#16955060)
>If you're storing usernames, passwords and the like then you have nothing to worry about.

Absolutely false. Anything pertaining to a person in any way is personal data. All default web server installations are GDPR violations, unless nginx grew an "edit the access.log entries pertaining to you" endpoint recently. (Although you can maybe argue "legitimate interest" for web access logging if you invest the time, and implement the right to erasure).

Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by tscs37 on Monday April 30, 2018 @12:30AM (#16955747)
Webserver logs are totally fine since you need them for information security (ie, finding out who has been spamming your webserver with requests), just use the default NGINX settings, in most distros that means deleting old logs automatically.
Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by manigandham on Sunday April 29, 2018 @09:40PM (#16955103)
You are incorrect. Even an IP address that dynamically changes with your ISP is considered personal data and is under strict guidelines. You have absolutely have a lot to worry about if you want to be in compliance.

Something as simple as running Google Analytics without a processing agreement in place is a liability.

Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by Guest9812398 on Monday April 30, 2018 @08:24AM (#16957952)
I was thinking about GA (Google Analytics) the other day, and how I can follow the GDPR guidelines. The articles I read, both from Google and other sources said to not use user IDs to identify users without consent, to anonymize IP addresses, and to not send PII information to Google, such as in URLs. Ok, that sounds simply enough, but then... I started thinking about it more.

1. User profiles can't be sent to GA. For example, hacker news has /user?id=JohnDoe for profiles, and that contains a username, which is personal data that should not be shared with GA. Ok, so I could rewrite my profile URLs before sending them to GA without the usernames.

2. I haven't heard a single source mention referrals. If I'm on a user profile on my site and click a link, that's going to send /user?id=JohnDoe to GA as the referral. I would need to overwrite the referrals before sending them to GA as well.

3. What about 404 pages that I make up? What if I visit https://www.example.com/JohnDoe? That's sending my personal name to GA again. Hmm, ok, the site could exclude GA from 404 pages.

4. What about search boxes? What if I use the search field on a blog? https://www.example.com/posts?search=JohnDoe. Hmm, that's my personal data being sent again. Ok, we need to make sure any data from search boxes is now stripped and not sent to GA.

5. What if I manually add a query parameter or modify one? A homepage might have https://www.example.com/?page=2, but what if I change it to https://www.example.com/?page=JohnDoe. Hmm, yes, that's personal data being sent again. I guess I need to validate the page parameter to ensure it's an integer before sending the URL to GA. What if I then type in a personal phone number as the page number?

Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by stevetrewick on Monday April 30, 2018 @04:19AM (#16956739)
No. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the law. IP addresses are considered PII if and only if they can actually be legally used to identify an individual. And even where they can be, what on earth are you doing with them that you imagine is non compliance?