News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by dingaling on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @06:02PM (#16926677)
Twas ever thus, but it's cyclical. In the 60s and 70s mainline airlines bought jets of 90 seats up from either Boeing or Douglas. Only nationalised airlines bought Vickers or Dassault, and pinko commies had to make do with Ilyushins and Tupolevs.

There was a brief period of competition in the late 70s / 80s when Airbus and Lockheed were trying to be different. Order was soon restored, then came the 90s with the regional jet fad and the rise of Embraer and Bombardier.

But now we're back to a big duopoly. Ilyushin are still around but only Cuba still buys from them. The next shake-up will come from China; once their civil aviation designs reach the sophistication of their military aircraft they'll start earning orders across Asia, then Europe..

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by hcarvalhoalves on Thursday April 26, 2018 @10:16PM (#16937971)
Embraer has potential to destabilize this duopoly with the E-Jet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embraer_E-Jet_E2_family) before China. Last month they just delivered the first units to a Norway airline.

Boeing made an strategic offer to acquire Embraer this year, before Embraer makes a dent on their market, but since it's a government controlled company there's a good chance it won't take the offer.

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by personlurking on Thursday April 26, 2018 @10:53PM (#16938135)
> but since it's a government controlled company there's a good chance it won't take the offer.

Though the most recent news on this says the deal is in advanced stages (according to Estadão). Apparently, it's likely to happen, given the appointment of a government representative to the board of the newly-formed company.

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by hcarvalhoalves on Thursday April 26, 2018 @11:07PM (#16938197)
Sad. If the deal doesn't include a clause for local operation or project continuity, they might just dismantle the local commercial jet division to kill competition and keep selling revised 737s :(
Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by mrtksn on Friday April 27, 2018 @01:14AM (#16938585)
Actually, Russia is back in business with Sukhoi Superjet 100[0]. They Already produced and sold quite a few aircraft despite the crash during the demonstration to clients[1]

[0]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Superjet_100

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Mount_Salak_Sukhoi_Superj...

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by gbuk2013 on Friday April 27, 2018 @03:35AM (#16939065)
There is also the Irkut MC-21 which will be a direct competitor to the A320. It is currently going through testing and certification process.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irkut_MC-21

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by ubernostrum on Friday April 27, 2018 @03:08AM (#16938962)
Russia and China are both in the small mainline-jet market. Russia with the Sukhoi SuperJet, China with the Comac C919.

China's AICC is also buying the rights to produce An-225s, including the tooling and training, supposedly in order to jump forward a bit more on engine tech (the C919 will use CFM Leap engines built overseas.

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by pouetpouet on Friday April 27, 2018 @04:23AM (#16939244)
Japan will also have the Mitsubishi Regional Jet with 90 seats.
Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by ubernostrum on Friday April 27, 2018 @04:57AM (#16939361)
They're developing it, yes. But I'm not expecting it to be much of a success, assuming it ever properly goes on the market at all.

Russia and China have a bit more leverage to get their airlines to buy home-grown aircraft.

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by paxys on Thursday April 26, 2018 @08:38PM (#16937449)
Interestingly, SpaceX is one of the very few companies that does rocket launches but not commercial or military aircraft. And they have recently released concept videos of Earth-to-Earth transport. How long before they make a real jump into commercial aviation?
Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by Robotbeat on Thursday April 26, 2018 @08:51PM (#16937518)
I don't know if SpaceX will do aviation other than the long-haul Mach 20 BFR type, but Elon Musk has expressed interest in high speed electric aviation as well. If Tesla and/or SpaceX end up being too successful, he'll probably guide one of them to that space.
Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by et2o on Thursday April 26, 2018 @08:43PM (#16937476)
They have already announced this as an eventual goal.
Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by rdlecler1 on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @07:03PM (#16927192)
And then maybe India will follow in China’s footsteps.
Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by noddy1 on Thursday April 26, 2018 @08:43PM (#16937475)
currently in china, was in bangalore last week..

China feels almost like a first world nation at this point (albeit a weird one).

India, even in the most prosperous/developed city is still essentially a crappy 3rd world place.

I don't think India will naturally follow the progress China has made, and I definitely don't think amazing manufacturing will suddenly spring up from nowhere in India.

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by rootusrootus on Thursday April 26, 2018 @09:13PM (#16937630)
I am in Hyderabad right now and I agree. Hitec City has a veneer of modern but it is thin and already showing wear after only a few years. And I don’t have to travel out of this area to see plenty of people living a third-world existence.

Having friends here now I want to see them succeed but at this point most of them that can figure out how to leave here, do.

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by ausvisaissues on Thursday April 26, 2018 @10:43PM (#16938088)
In China, the poor living in rural areas cannot easily move to cities (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hukou_system). In India the poor can move to cities.
Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by robjan on Thursday April 26, 2018 @09:05PM (#16937572)
It really depends on which part of China you are visiting. The first tier cities are superficially way more developed than most countries in the world (although not so much in terms of quality of life and access to opportunities). As you move down the tiers you see the opposite end of the spectrum and some of the poorest and least developed parts of the world.
Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by fireattack on Thursday April 26, 2018 @09:16PM (#16937647)
I think his points is in India, even tier one cities are still feel like 3rd world.

(Just paraphrased what he said, I've never been in India).

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by kamaal on Friday April 27, 2018 @06:11AM (#16939631)
>>India, even in the most prosperous/developed city is still essentially a crappy 3rd world place.

As an Indian, I would say you are right. India is attempting to skip several cycles of progress and arrive at the end result. There are also deep socio-economic problems to solve.

A more important problem is that quality of Human resources. Things like infrastructure are easier to fix compared to building a educated, civilized and highly trained workforce.

>>I don't think India will naturally follow the progress China has made

The Chinese kind of politics is impossible in a country as diverse as India. If you force through you only end up breaking the country. So we will never have a single party, single flavor rule in India.

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by youpassbutter on Friday April 27, 2018 @01:15PM (#16942453)
> There are also deep socio-economic problems to solve.

The biggest problem is that india has a mindset problem. They, especially their leaders, academics, etc do not see themselves as a major nation. It's why india is still part of the british commonwealth.

> The Chinese kind of politics is impossible in a country as diverse as India. If you force through you only end up breaking the country.

That's the mindset I was speaking of. Indians themselves see progress as impossible. Also, China is a diverse nation as well, that hasn't prevent them from organizing and progressing.

What india needs is a healthy dose of nationalism and learn to stand on her own. But that will never happen as long as india is subservient to britain. India has a world of potential and none of the execution. All because of the mindset of the leadership and the people. It's tragic.

Re:Boeing and Airbus, the new ‘super duopoly’ by dghughes on Friday April 27, 2018 @09:49AM (#16940741)
There is a man living in China who makes YouTube videos from a Western perspective the channel name is ADVChina. In one video he visited India and said the big difference between India and China the obvious being India's ethnic diversity and religions. In China Communism pretty much wiped out religion and the people are more homogeneous than India.

And as mentioned in a comment above the first-world sections are mainly the large cities, the countryside is still essentially third-world conditions.

Plus recently it seems China has become very increasingly anti-Western, this man has lived there 12 years and has said recently a strong anti-Western vibe has begun to be noticeable.