Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by davidsawyer on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @02:31PM
(#16924549)
Maybe this is what is being referenced: https://www.quora.com/What-percentage-of-San-Francisco-apart...
Though, I don't think this is "rent control" in the NYC sense of the term where rents are kept way under market rate.
Rather, it seems to be a set of ordinances around what landlords can and can't do, largely pertaining to rent increases: http://sfrb.org/rent-ordinance
Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by pmiller2 on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @05:02PM
(#16926123)
In NYC terms, I believe "rent control" in SF is more akin to "rent stabilization."
Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by nerfhammer on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @02:23PM
(#16924463)
this source claims 72% is more accurate: https://www.quora.com/What-percentage-of-San-Francisco-apart...
Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by conanbatt on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @02:30PM
(#16924536)
Wow this law is so ridiculous, it basically applies to most the stock.
I don't think most people enjoy this benefit of rent control, it wouldn't make sense to rent out properties. I wonder what is the effective rent control rate (that which has affected price significantly). Maybe a rental turnover rate would hint at a solution.
Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by csisvunit on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @03:45PM
(#16925316)
rent control is what's keeping san francisco, barely, san francisco. it isnt going away. its also whats keeping my landlord from doubling my rent, thank you very much.
Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by conanbatt on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @04:37PM
(#16925856)
People that don't have (effective) rent control do not feel the way you do.
Re:90-minute ‘super commutes’ more common as Bay Area housin...
by nerfhammer on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @04:33PM
(#16925810)
Congratulations, you've got a new kind of arbitrarily allocated ownership.
That sounds like too much.