Hijack of Amazon’s domain service used to reroute web traffic for two hours

Re:Hijack of Amazon’s domain service used to reroute web tra... by tekstar on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @05:35PM (#16916835)

> But MEW doesn't have HSTS? I would never use it personally on a public Wifi, but many people will for sure and they have no idea they'd be MITM'd.

Even without HSTS a bad actor would have to either trick a user to install a root cert or trick a certificate authority to generate a cert for the domain. Both of these are possible and have happened in the past, but they're also are a requirement for the attack you mention that you seemed to have completely forgotten about.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hijack of Amazon’s domain service used to reroute web tra... by C4K3 on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @06:20PM (#16917167)

No they wouldn't, without HSTS a bad actor (public wifi) could just do an SSL strip attack. Sure, observant users would notice that the page isn't over https, and with browsers adding warnings on all http pages, that'll become more obvious, but it's still not something most people notice.

Are you thinking of HPKP?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hijack of Amazon’s domain service used to reroute web tra... by tekstar on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @09:41AM (#16921404)

ah, yes, I was confusing HSTS with HPKP.

Now I need to re-read the whole thread with this context. Thanks for the correction!

[ Parent | on HN ]