News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung's 970 EVO SSDs Reviewed – 500GB and 1TB by pkaye on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @02:54PM (#16915517)
I've worked on PLP implementations in the past. Mostly it was the added cost of capacitors. Also things like laptops don't really need them since they have batteries and will shut down gracefully when battery is running low.

The capacitors needs to be reliable, small form factor and hold enough charge to keep the controller, DRAM and NAND powered for a minimum of 15-30ms. 10 years ago what was available was not so great but now the options are much better.

Re:Samsung's 970 EVO SSDs Reviewed – 500GB and 1TB by whitepoplar on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @02:59PM (#16915556)
Given your work with PLP, which family of SSDs would you recommend most?
Re:Samsung's 970 EVO SSDs Reviewed – 500GB and 1TB by pkaye on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @03:15PM (#16915673)
I personally use the Samsung PRO SSDs myself these days. I don't go with the latest models because the older NAND technology tends to be more reliable. Also you want a company with many product cycles so that the firmware has time to mature. Just too many edge cases in SSD firmware to catch them in one go.
Re:Samsung's 970 EVO SSDs Reviewed – 500GB and 1TB by AnonymousR on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @08:28PM (#16917848)
Well, speaking of firmware, the current state of Samsung's SSD firmware is incredibly poor.

I jumped ship from SATAs to M.2 a month ago with a new computer and to quickly sum up the situation with Samsung 960 Pro from own experience and hundred page long threads on official product forum:

- last published firmware on website is 2 (don't know the long number now, writing from phone)

- a version 3 was released, system freezing started occurring in some cases and some people even ended up with bricked drives (in relation to eDrive IIRC)

- bricked drives could be reportedly used again after PSID revert, but Samsung consistently refuses to release the tool (other manufacturers do and the tool is also useful for recovering drive with lost OPAL password)

- firmware 4 reportedly exists, which can be obtained through Magician (Samsung's tool for SSD) and should solve problems from version 3. Conflicting reports on performance.

The craziest stuff is that:

- Magician will now tell you there is a new firmware for your drive, but it won't tell you with which version is it going to "enrich" your shiny new drive. Will I get 3? Or 4? Especially when only 2 is posted on the Samsung's page!

- firmware changelogs are kept secred, just install this for no reason

- no downgrades are possible

Worse than X25-M password bug. You have to be scavenging official forums for information that should be posted with the firmware and be cursing at/begging moderators to reveal some more. Ah and reportedly there is some mysterious incompatibility with major BIOS vendors in regard to eDrive. No, they won't tell what the bug is, nor on what boards.

Also, custom OPAL PBAs (image flashed to special unlocked area on disk for booting with disk locked down) don't boot in current desktop boards. Might be non-Samsung issue, maybe the one mentioned above.

How does this stuff work together at all?